BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 14 May 2025 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2008 Oligocene shallow marine foraminifera from the subsurface of southern Hokkaido
Satoshi Hanagata
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Foraminiferal faunas from the Upper Oligocene Minaminaganuma Formation recovered from boreholes of the Yufutsu Oil and Gas Field and MITI Umaoi located in southern Hokkaido are characterized exclusively by the large elphidiids Elphidium mabutii and Cribroelphidium ombetsuense. They indicate cold water temperatures and an inner to middle sublittoral paleobathymetry. The total organic carbon (TOC) content and hydrogen index (HI) values obtained by CHN Corder and Rock-Eval pyrolysis indicate the significant deposition of organic carbon of phytoplankton origin in the inner sublittoral condition. Elphidium mabutii and C. ombetsuense show ubiquitous distribution suggesting high tolerance of these two species against environmental stresses such as fluctuations in primary productivity (nutritional condition). This newly recognized shallow marine fauna is located between the Eocene-Oligocene Poronai-Momijiyama fauna (agglutinated foraminifera dominant) and the Miocene Takinoue fauna (Ammonia dominant). A comparison between the thickness of strata and the range of paleobathymetric changes in the study area suggests that an equilibrium between basin subsidence and sediment accumulation existed to keep this area under shallow marine conditions during a certain period in the Late Oligocene, which preceded the rifting of the Japan Sea during the Early Miocene.

Introduction

Information on Late Oligocene foraminifera in the northwestern Pacific region is fragmentary due to the lack of a continuous marine sequence across the Oligocene-Miocene transition, and also due to an absence of age-diagnostic planktonic microfossils in the region. These gaps have arisen mainly because the Oligocene was a period of low sea level coinciding with the formation of major unconformities and hiatuses (Pomerol and Premoli-Silva, 1986; Haq et al., 1987).

A similar observation has been made in Hokkaido, Japan, where thick Paleogene and Neogene sequences were formed, and several important stratigraphic and paleontologic studies have been performed (e.g., Asano, 1952a e.g., Asano, 1953; Kaiho, 1984a, b). Kurita and Yokoi (2000) recently described the Minaminaganuma Formation in southern central Hokkaido. They determined the age of the formation, previously believed to be Neogene, to be Late Oligocene based on diatom and palynologic (dinoflagellate and pollen) biostratigraphy (Figure 1). The formation intercalates fossiliferous marine strata in the nonmarine strata; therefore, the foraminiferal fauna from the formation is expected to provide fundamental information on paleoceanography, tectonics, and other paleoenvironmental factors in the Oligocene of the northwestern Pacific realm.

Figure 1.

Age distribution of the Minaminaganuma Formation and its adjoining formations in the Yufutsu-Umaoi region after Kurita and Yokoi (2000).

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f01.gif

The Paleogene and Neogene sedimentary rocks in southwestern Hokkaido are generally distributed in ascending order from east to west on the western side of the central axis of the Hidaka Mountains (Figure 2). The Paleogene and Neogene sequences extend further westward into the subsurface of the Ishikari Plain, as revealed by many boreholes including the present ones. The upper part of the Minaminaganuma Formation is exposed at the surface of Umaoi Hill, a topographic feature that resides along an axial part of an anticline accompanying a fault system (Kurita and Yokoi, 2000), whereas its lower part, which is more fossiliferous, is restricted to the subsurface and inaccessible at any surface section. Therefore, rock samples of the lower part of the Minaminaganuma Formation are presently available only as ditch cuttings and cores from boreholes drilled for petroleum exploration.

Figure 2.

Index map of the study borehole sections. Distribution of the Paleogene and Neogene formations based on the compilation of Kato (1990) with slight modifications.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f02.gif

This study reports on the foraminiferal fauna obtained from four borehole sections. Three of the sections are in the Yufutsu Oil and Gas Field, east of Tomakomai City, along the Pacific coast of southern Hokkaido, drilled by Japan Petroleum Exploration Co. Ltd. (JAPEX), and the fourth section is the MITI Umaoi borehole drilled by Japan National Oil Corporation approximately 25 km north of the Yufutsu Field. The study sections from the Yufutsu Field are hereafter referred to as the wells A, B, and C.

In addition, geochemical data obtained by Rock-Eval pyrolysis and CHN Corder analyses that were conducted for the MITI Umaoi samples are used for interpretations of the paleoenvironment.

Geologic setting and lithostratigraphy of study sections

The formations in the Yufutsu-Umaoi region in ascending order are as follows: (1) the Cretaceous granitoids (basement); (2) conglomeratic and coal-bearing formations of the Ishikari Group; (3) the Eocene Poronai Formation; (4) the Oligocene Minaminaganuma Formation; (5) the Miocene Takinoue Formation (= Unit IV of Hanagata and Hiramatsu, 2005); and (6) other Neogene formations (= Units III–I of Hanagata and Hiramatsu, 2005). The foraminiferal fauna both above and below the Minaminaganuma Formation in the Yufutsu-Umaoi region and their paleoenvironmental implications have previously been reported by the author and a coworker (Hanagata, 2002; Hanagata and Hiramatsu, 2005).

The upper part of the Minaminaganuma Formation at Umaoi Hill is exposed to the surface (the MITI Umaoi well is located in the western fringe of the hill) at the axial part of the anticline that extends toward the north and south. On the other hand, the lower part is restricted to the subsurface and remains inaccessible from surface sections. The extension of the formation is broadly recognized in the subsurface of the southern Ishikari Plain (Kurita and Yokoi, 2000). The upper sequence of the surface section is dominated by terrestrial coarse-grained sediments with alternations of sandstone and carbonbearing mudstone beds, sandstone, and acidic tuff beds. It is occasionally intercalated with marine siltstone beds, which yield the large (> 1 mm) benthic foraminifer Elphidium mabutii Asano (Kurita and Yokoi, 2000). In contrast, the lower sequences composed mainly of bedded or massive siltstone strata have yielded diverse foraminifers as reported below.

The geologic ages obtained from the upper section of the formation are based on diatom and palynologic biostratigraphies present in the surface section of Umaoi Hill (Kurita and Yokoi, 2000). An occurrence of the diatom Lisitzinina ornata Jouse is particularly age diagnostic and restricts the age of the horizon to within the Late Oligocene, ca. 28 to 24 Ma (Gladenkov and Barron, 1995; Morita et al., 1996). No Miocene species have been found from the formation.

The lithology of the subsurface sections has been described by wellsite geologists based on observations of ditch cuttings and cores (Figures 3, 4). The basal part of the formation is characterized by alternations of conglomerate, sandstone, and tuff beds, which cover the underlying Eocene Poronai Formation disconformably. The middle section of the formation is composed of olive-gray to olive-black siltstone and yields abundant foraminifers. It also intercalates light-gray acidic tuff beds, tuffaceous sandstone beds, and tuff breccia. The upper sequence is composed mainly of alternating sandstone and tuff beds; further, it intercalates tuffaceous sandstone, mudstone, and thin coal beds similar to the lithofacies of surface outcrops. In a wider sense, the Minaminaganuma Formation exhibits a single cycle of transgression followed by regression.

Figure 3.

Lithologic columns and the occurrence of foraminifera (N/100 g) in the sections of the Yufutsu Field. Each column is arranged at the base horizon of the marine strata.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f03.gif

Figure 4.

Lithologic column and N/100 g of foraminifera from the MITI Umaoi borehole. N/100 g is shown on a logarithmic scale except for numbers 0–1. For legend of lithology, see Figure 3.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f401.gif

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f402.gif

The formation thickness is approximately 300 to 700 m in the Yufutsu Field expanding to approximately 1900 m in the Umaoi area. Kurita and Yokoi (2000) indicated that such a difference in formation thickness is attributable to the pull-apart/transtensional tectonics in the Late Oligocene to Early Miocene in southern Hokkaido.

A major fault exists at the top of the Minaminaganuma Formation in well B, which is confirmed by the correlation of physical borehole loggings (see geologic section of Fujii and Moritani, 1998). On the other hand, three low-angle faults have been proposed for the formation of the MITI Umaoi as shown in the geologic section by Kurita and Yokoi (2000). A lack of repetition of the strata indicates that these faults are minor and do not affect the conclusions of this report.

Materials and methods

The three well sections of the Yufutsu Field are drilled with deviations. Therefore, the term “depth” used in this study neither means thickness of the formation nor level but rather the uncorrected drilling length from the surface measured by drill pipes. The MITI Umaoi borehole is drilled vertically, and its depth is close to the level from the ground. All the samples and specimens are stored in the collection of JAPEX Research Center, Mihamaku Hamada 1-2-1, Chiba City, Chiba 261-0025, Japan.

Foraminiferal analysis

Ditch cuttings and cores were used for the analysis of foraminifers. Ditch cuttings were taken at every 20 m with some extra ones. The cores of the Minaminaganuma Formation were taken from the three horizons of the MITI Umaoi as shown in the columnar section (Figure 4). Although the cuttings may contain cavings from the upper horizons, the borehole conditions while drilling were good; therefore, for the purpose of this study, possible downhole contamination can be considered negligible.

All the samples were oven dried. Subsamples of approximately 100 g were then soaked in a hot supersaturated solution of sodium sulfate for approximately three hours. After removing the excess solution, the soaked samples were maintained in the same condition for more than three days. The samples were then wet sieved through an opening screen of 125 μm. All the specimens in the residues were collected and identified.

This study employed two indices of diversity; species richness (SR) and Simpson's index of diversity (SID). SID is the reciprocal of λ = (Σ(ni/N)2, where ni = number of species i, and N = total number of specimens; the concentration index of Simpson, 1949).

Geochemical analysis

Forty-five samples obtained from the MITI Umaoi borehole were used for Rock-Eval and CHN Corder analyses. The ditch cuttings, cores, and samples taken from borehole walls using a wireline tool (Chronological Sample Taker; ©Schlumberger Ltd.) were utilized for the analysis.

Approximately 10–15 mg of rocks were pulverized for analysis. The samples were analyzed using an automatic pyrolysis analyzer, Rock-Eval 6 (VINCI Technologies, France) and CHN Corder (Yanaco Analytical Instruments Co., Tokyo), both presently installed in JAPEX Research Center. Figure 5 illustrates the principles of the Rock-Eval analysis (after Espitalié et al., 1977). These apparatuses provide various data such as residual total organic carbon (TOC), Tmax, hydrogen index (HI), and oxygen index (OI) based on the volume of gas generated through heating of the materials and their peak temperatures (see examples of Japanese materials: Takeda, 1980; Watanabe and Akiyama, 1998). Tmax is an indicator of organic maturity and the HI-OI diagram is used to classify kerogen types, specifically type I (algal organic matter), type II (marine organic matter), and type III (terrigenous organic matter).

Figure 5.

Principle of the Rock-Eval analysis. The apparatus detects pyrolytically generated gas volumes (S1, S2, and S3) with increasing temperature. The hydrogen index (HI = S2/TOC) is a proxy of the hydrogen/carbon ratio (H/C) and the oxygen index (OI = S3/TOC) is a proxy of the oxygen/carbon ratio (O/C). Organic matter of phytoplanktonic origin tends to have a higher H/C than that of terrestrial (higher plants) origin, whereas terrestrial organic matter tends to have a higher O/C. Such a character is applied to the HI-OI diagram (Figure 6) and used to distinguish the kerogen types. Note that Tmax is an empirical index of organic maturation obtained at the peak temperature of S2, and this does not mean that the sample was geothermally heated to the indicated temperature at any time in its history.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f05.gif

Figure 6.

Hydrogen index–oxygen index diagram. See explanation provided in Figure 5. Marine and nonmarine samples are distinguished based on the occurrence of foraminifera.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f06.gif

Results

In the three well sections of the Yufutsu Field, four foraminiferal species from four genera were identified in 22 samples (Table 1). In the MITI Umaoi section, on the other hand, 13 species of 13 genera were distinguished from 86 samples, and 43 samples were devoid of foraminifera (Table 2). The abundance of foraminifera in 100 g rock samples (N/100 g) is shown with lithologic columns in Figures 3 and 4. Most samples devoid of foraminifera are from the upper interval of the MITI Umaoi section between 20 m and 1860 m.

Table 1.

List of foraminifera from three well sections in the Yufutsu Oil and Gas Field.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-t01.gif

Table 2.

List of foraminifera from the well MITI Umaoi.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-t02.gif

Benthic assemblages are quite monotonous (average SR = 3.57, SID = 1.98) and are dominated by two species–Elphidium mabutii Asano and Cribroelphidium ombetsuense (Asano)–in all sections. Buccella oregonensis (Cushman, Stewart, and Stewart) is third in abundance after the two elphidiids. Relatively diverse foraminiferal assemblages in the MITI Umaoi, including Bolivina sp. 1, Bulimina sp. 1, Globocassidulina sp. 1, and Pullenia aff. Pullenia apertula Cushman, are found at 1920 m, 2420 m, and 3000 m with peak N/100 g (N/100 g = 441 at 1920 m; 370 at 2420 m; 614 at 3000 m). Maximum diversities also exist around these horizons (SR = 8 at 1940 m and 1980 m; SID = 3.54 at 1900 m). Planktonic foraminifera were absent in the whole sequence of the formation.

The results of the Rock-Eval and CHN Corder analyses are present in Table 3. Tmax indicates temperatures less than 435°C excluding one sample (1720.55 m) that exhibits 436°C. Since a Tmax of approximately 435°C is believed to be an oil-generating level (Tissot et al., 1974), I regard the data obtained in this study to be indicative of depositional geochemical facies without significant dispersion by organic maturation with the exception of the sample at 1720.55 m that did not yield foraminifera. Two samples in the lower horizon (3300 m and 2700 m) have a relatively high TOC, while most of the remaining samples exhibit a TOC of less than 1%. The averages for the TOC, HI, and OI of the marine (fossiliferous) sediments are 0.76%, 90 mg/g, and 52 mg/g, respectively.

Table 3.

Result of the Rock-Eval and CHN Corder analyses. CT = Ditch cuttings, CST = Chronological Sample Taker (wireline tool).

i1342-8144-12-2-99-t03.gif

Paleoenvironment

Paleobathymetry

The extinct elphidiids Elphidium mabutii and Cribroelphidium ombetsuense dominate the foraminiferal fauna of the Minaminaganuma Formation. These species are believed to be indicative of shallow marine conditions since, with the exception of the bathyal species Elphidium batialis (Saidova, 1961; = Elphidium abyssicola Ishiwada, 1962), many modern elphidiids live in shallow marine environments (e.g., Elphidium bartletti of Loeblich and Tappan, 1953; Elphidium clavatum of Buzas, 1966 and Lagoe, 1979).

The occurrences of Bolivina, Bulimina, and Globocassidulina in the MITI Umaoi section indicate a relatively deeper paleobathymetry than the inner sublittoral zone in comparison with the modern species of the same genera in the northwest Pacific Ocean (after compilation of Akimoto and Hasegawa, 1989). These genera are also reported from the middle sublittoral and deeper depositional conditions of the Eocene of Hokkaido (Hanagata, 2002). Conversely, there is no reason to suspect deeper paleobathymetry than the middle sublittoral zone. Moreover, it should be mentioned that diversity is generally higher in the middle than in the inner sublittoral assemblages that are dominated by Elphidium mabutii and Cribroelphidium ombetsuense. An absence of planktonic foraminifera also suggests a coastal (neritic) condition (Lipps and Warme, 1966; Lipps, 1979).

Consequently, the paleobathymetry inferred for most of the marine sequences of the Minaminaganuma Formation is the inner sublittoral zone in most of the Yufutsu Field, whereas the maximum water depth extended to the middle sublittoral zone in the Umaoi area.

Paleotemperature

The foraminiferal fauna of the Minaminaganuma Formation is unique, and a comparable Paleogene assemblage could not be detected in the course of study. However, this fauna is presumed to be one of the boreal/cold water faunas of the northwestern Pacific region since similar faunas dominated by large elphidiids are known from the modern Arctic region (Loeblich and Tappan, 1953).

Ammonia, Pararotalia, and other rotaliids occur abundantly in the Recent as well as the Early to Middle Miocene coastal areas of northern Japan (Akimoto and Hasegawa, 1989; Hasegawa et al., 1989), which indicates a warm temperate climate. An Ammonia yubariensis (Asano)-dominant fauna has also been reported from the Miocene strata overlying the Minaminaganuma Formation in the Yufutsu Field (Unit IV of Hanagata and Hiramatsu, 2005), which are correlative to the surface Takinoue Formation. Asano (1952a) described a similar A. yubariensis [= Rotalia yubariensis]-dominant fauna from the Takinoue Formation in the Momijiyama district, northeast of the Yufutsu Field. The present study describes this Miocene Ammonia-dominant fauna as the Takinoue fauna. The absence of rotaliids or related/ancestral taxa in the present material also indicates colder water conditions at shallow marine depths. The Late Oligocene was an overall cold and low sea level period (Haq et al., 1987); therefore, this faunal change in southern Hokkaido is considered to mirror the global climate shift between the Oligocene and the Miocene.

Primary productivity/nutritional environment and dissolved oxygen

This section discusses the further paleoenvironmental implications of the foraminiferal assemblages based on the correlations between foraminiferal proxies and geochemical data obtained by Rock-Eval and CHN Corder analyses. The values of TOC, HI, and OI are basic indicators of organic facies closely related to primary productivity and the oxygenation of the sea bed (Espitalié et al., 1977).

As a premise to the consideration, marine and nonmarine samples are distinguished based on the occurrences of foraminifers. The HI-OI diagram (Figure 6) indicates that most terrestrial samples are plotted on the trend curve of type III kerogen that indicates organic matter of terrestrial origin, while many marine rocks exhibit higher HI values and are plotted near the trend curves of type I–II kerogen. In addition, the TOC and HI exhibit high correlation (Figure 7). This data suggests a significant accumulation of organic matter that originated predominantly from marine phytoplankton and/or the oxygen-depleted conditions that are conducive to the preservation of organic matter.

Figure 7.

Correlation between hydrogen index and total organic carbon.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f07.gif

The foraminiferal numbers per gram of rock (N/g) are expected to indicate the standing stocks of foraminiferal assemblages and to be positively correlated with the TOC in many cases of modern deep-sea foraminifera (e.g., Altenbach et al., 1999). The N/g, however, increases to a TOC of approximately 0.7%, but it then decreases with increasing TOC (Figure 8A). The N/g also exhibits a peak at 75 mg/g HI (Figure 8B). The relationships between organic facies (TOC and HI) and diversities (SR and SID) also exhibit peaks at 0.7% TOC and 80 mg/g HI (Figure 8C–F). These peaks of TOC and HI are indistinct but are considered to indicate favorable conditions, i.e., environmental optima for many benthic species. Assemblages of the middle sublittoral zone (samples of 2000 m, 2200 m, 2400 m, and 3000 m), which indicate high diversity, appear in the middle of the peak. This suggests that the environmental stress due to fluctuation of primary productivity (unstable nutrient supply for foraminifers) and/or oxygen depletion is greater in shallower marine environments than in deeper marine environments. Moreover, the ubiquitous occurrence of Elphidium mabutii and Cribroelphidium ombetsuense in most of the inner sublittoral samples suggests a high tolerance of these two species to environmental stresses.

Figure 8.

Relationship between organic facies and foraminiferal proxies. TOC: Total organic carbon content (%). HI: Hydrogen index (mg-HC/g-Org.C). N/g: Number of specimens in one gram of rock. SR: Species richness. SID: Diversity index of Simpson (1949; 1/λ). See Figure 7 for legend of open and solid circles.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f08.gif

Considering oxygen depletion in the sea bed to be a main cause of high TOC (> 0.7%) and HI (> 80 mg/g), an essential requirement is the stratification of the water mass in a shallow sea, which prevents vertical circulation and induces oxygen depletion near the sea bed (see summary of Tyson and Pearson, 1991). However, it is difficult to infer such stratified conditions that are caused solely by fresh water input (density stratification) from foraminiferal assemblages; the foraminiferal assemblages of the Minaminaganuma Formation do not contain agglutinated taxa that might suggest a decrease in carbonate saturation similar to modern brackish conditions (see summary of Sen Gupta, 1999). Seasonal temperature change, on the other hand, could be a cause of the stratification (thermal stratification) and resultant oxygen depletion. However, the success of largesized elphidiids, which implies a high rate of dissolved oxygen consumption and slower cycles of generation change (Phleger and Soutar, 1973), tends to suggest stable oxic conditions. Consequently, fluctuation of primary production (unstable nutritional conditions) is considered to have been the primary factor facilitating the high TOC/HI that determined foraminiferal distribution. Oxygen depletion, if it occurred, is likely to have been a minor contributory factor.

Compared with deep-sea foraminifera (summarized by Loubere and Fariduddin, 1999), the contribution of primary productivity toward the distribution of benthic foraminifers in shallow coastal seas has been comparatively little studied. The results presented here might provide an example of how the deposition of organic matter acted as a primary factor in controlling the distribution of shallow marine benthic foraminifera during the Late Oligocene. However, it must be borne in mind that the distribution of shallow marine benthic foraminifera is not only controlled by nutritional conditions and oxygen levels but also by various additional factors including substrate conditions and predator-prey interactions (e.g., Kaminski and Wetzel, 2004). Moreover, geochemical data inevitably include somewhat (biologically or chemically) degraded residual organic carbon; hence there is no guarantee that they mirror the original depositional conditions.

Comparison with the other Oligocene faunas in the adjacent regions

In order to position the foraminiferal fauna of the Minaminaganuma Formation in the context of paleoceanographic and faunal evolution in Hokkaido and adjacent areas, this section compares it with faunas in adjacent regions. In order to avoid taxonomic confusion, Hanagata's (2002) taxonomic view is applied in the following discussion.

Momijiyama Formation in southern Hokkaido

Several workers have described the Oligocene foraminiferal faunas of Hokkaido (e.g., Maiya et al., 1982; Takayanagi et al., 1982; Kaiho, 1984a, b; Kaiho and Hasegawa, 1984). Kaiho (1984a) described the fauna of the Momijiyama Formation from southern central Hokkaido. Kurita and Miwa (1998) indicated the geologic age of the upper section of the formation to be Early Oligocene based on palynologic data. In addition, the Momijiyama Formation is presumed to have a conformable contact with the underlying Eocene Poronai Formation, an extension of which exists in the subsurface of the Yufutsu Oil and Gas Field. Consequently, the foraminiferal fauna of the Momijiyama Formation is positioned historically between that of the Poronai Formation and that of the Minaminaganuma Formation (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Correlation between the major Oligocene-Miocene formations and their foraminiferal fauna representing shallow marine conditions in southern Hokkaido and DSDP Site 439. Abundant and representative species are listed in the column “foraminiferal fauna.”

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f09.gif

The foraminiferal fauna of the Momijiyama For-mation contains abundant agglutinated foraminifera, including Evolutinella subamakusaensis (Fukuta) and Cyclammina pacifica Beck, exhibiting high similarity to those of the underlying Poronai Formation. This agglutinated foraminifera-dominant fauna, referred to henceforth as the Poronai-Momijiyama fauna, indicate shallow marine/brackish conditions (Hanagata, 2003). This older fauna is evidently different from those of the Minaminaganuma Formation described in this study; consequently, the paleoceanographic conditions in the region are assumed to have changed between the times of deposition of the Momijiyama and Minaminaganuma formations.

Eastern Hokkaido

The Oligocene foraminiferal fauna in eastern Hokkaido was extensively described from the Charo, Nuibetsu and Kamicharo formations in the Shiranuka area, and the Tatsukobu, Tsubetsu, and Toika formations in the Kitami area.

Kaiho (1983) described the planktonic foraminifera Globorotalia opima opima Bolli [= Paragloborotalia opima opima] from the upper horizon of the Kamicharo Formation in the Shiranuka area. The last occurrence of G. opima opima is estimated to have been the early Late Oligocene (27.1 Ma; Berggren et al., 1995).

Benthic foraminiferal faunas of the Charo, Nuibetsu, and Kamicharo formations are diverse and are assigned to the Poronai-Momijiyama fauna based on abundant agglutinated foraminifera including E. subamakusaensis, Haplophragmoides yokoyamai Kaiho, and Poronaia poronaiensis (Asano), and also characteristic calcareous species such as Bulimina schwageri Yokoyama, Plectofrondicularia smithi Kaiho, Gyroidina yokoyamai Ujiié, and Nonion ezoensis (Kaiho) (Maiya et al., 1981; Kaiho and Hasegawa, 1984; Kaiho, 1984b).

Takayanagi et al. (1982) reported foraminiferal faunas from the Toika Formation of the Kitami area. They estimated the geologic age of the formation as middle P. 22 to upper N. 7 following Blow's (1969) zonation, Late Oligocene to Early Miocene based on the cooccurrence of the planktonic species Catapsydrax spp. and Globoquadrina cf. venezuelana (Hedberg) [cf. Globigerina venezuelana]. However, the stratigraphic overlap of G. venezuelana and Catapsydrax was revised by later workers (Toumarkine and Luterbacher, 1985; Bolli and Saunders, 1985), indicating an interval from P. 13 to N. 7 in Blow's (1969) zonation, Middle Eocene to Early Miocene. Therefore, the estimated range of the geologic age of the Toika Formation has an older lower limit and overlaps with that of the Poronai and Momijiyama formations in southern Hokkaido.

Benthic foraminiferal faunas of the Tatsukobu, Tsubetsu, and Toika formations resemble each other and are composed of abundant agglutinated foraminifera similar to the Poronai-Momijiyama fauna such as C. pacifica, E. subamakusaensis, H. yokoyamai, and P. poronaiensis (Takayanagi et al., 1982).

Consequently, the Oligocene foraminiferal faunas of eastern Hokkaido exhibit high similarity with those of the Poronai and Momijiyama Formations in southern Hokkaido but are different from that of the Minaminaganuma Formation. Although information on the geologic age is insufficient to draw a conclusion and requires further study, and the coexistence of two different types of fauna is undeniable, the difference in fauna suggests historical paleoceanographic changes such as an increase in the carbonate saturation between the ages of the Kamicharo and Minaminaganuma formations.

DSDP Japan Trench

Keller (1980) described an “Upper Oligocene” foraminiferal fauna that bears Elphidium mabutii and other calcareous benthic species including Bolivina substriatula Asano, Cassidulina laevigata d'Orbigny, and Epistominella danvillensis Howe and Wallace from Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) Leg 57, Site 439. This site is located 1656 meters below sea level on the inner trench slope of the Japan Trench, approximately 140 km offshore from northern Honshu (Figure 2). This E. mabutiibearing stratum overlies the Cretaceous at this site. The 40Ar/39Ar ages were obtained from a boulder of volcanic rock obtained from the conglomerate bed underlying the E. mabutii-bearing strata. The 40Ar/39Ar ages were indicated as 23.4 ± 5.5 Ma (Moore and Fujioka, 1980) and 21.2 ± 0.7 Ma (Yanagisawa et al., 1980), respectively. The report of Yanagisawa et al. (1980), in particular, applied the stepheating dating method for three rock samples, and each sample indicates close geologic ages suggesting that the alteration after deposition is negligible. The data from both sources indicate a younger age than the Oligocene-Miocene boundary (23.8 Ma; Steininger, 1994, after Berggren et al., 1995). The diatom biostratigraphy of this site was reexamined by Akiba (1985). Diatoms were not obtained from the horizon that yielded E. mabutii, although they were reported in the overlying horizons of the Early Miocene Thalassiosira fraga Zone (20.3–18.4 Ma; Yanagisawa and Akiba, 1998).

Based on the above-mentioned geologic ages, I conclude that the age of the E. mabutii-bearing strata of DSDP Site 439 is not Late Oligocene but rather Early Miocene, which is approximately 21 Ma, and therefore younger than the Minaminaganuma Formation. In other words, as far as geologic ages presently available for these horizons indicate, the E. mabutii-dominant fauna appears to have originated in the Late Oligocene and thrived until the Early Miocene in the shallow marine environment of the northwest Pacific region.

Tectonic implications

Significant differences exist in the thickness of the Minaminaganuma Formation between the Yufutsu Field and the Umaoi area. This implies that subsidence was faster in the Umaoi area than in the Yufutsu Field. This is consistent with the paleobathymetric interpretation that greater depths existed in a northward direction.

The foraminiferal fauna of the Minaminaganuma Formation indicates inner sublittoral or middle sublittoral paleobathymetry. The water depth of these paleobathy metric zones in the modern Pacific coast off northern Japan is approximately 70 m shallower (Akimoto and Hasegawa, 1989). In contrast, the thickness of the marine deposit exceeds 500 m at the location of the MITI Umaoi borehole even after consideration of stratigraphic repetitions by faults (refer to the geologic section of Kurita and Yokoi, 2000). These facts indicate that the sedimentary basin had subsided, maintaining shallow marine conditions during a certain period of the Late Oligocene. This means that the subsidence and sediment supply was balanced in this particular basin. Moreover, the marine sediments of the formation are dominated by siltstone, which was supposedly supplied under low-energy conditions and distal to the hinterland. A similar subsidence-sediment supply balanced condition is reported from the underlying Eocene Poronai Formation distributed in the Yufutsu-Umaoi area and adjacent region of southern Hokkaido (Hanagata, 2003). The Poronai Formation also has siltstone/claystone facies. This suggests that similar tectonics had controlled southern Hokkaido from the Eocene through Oligocene periods.

Kurita and Yokoi (2000) and Kuniyasu and Yamada (2004) explained the tectonics of the Minaminaganuma Formation in terms of a pull-apart basin model. The results of the present study provide an additional factor for the consideration of the basin history; i.e., the intermittent basin-subsidence is in equilibrium with the sediment accumulation.

Western Hokkaido is assumed to have been a part of the Asian continental margin in the Oligocene until the beginning of the rift leading to the formation of the Japan Sea in the Early Miocene that strongly affected the tectonics of Hokkaido (Kimura and Tamaki, 1986; Iijima and Tada, 1990; Takahashi, 1994; Hoshi and Takahashi, 1999; Hanagata and Hiramatsu, 2005). Therefore, a significant shift in the tectonic setting is thought to have occurred during or just after the deposition of the Minaminaganuma Formation.

Summary

  1. The foraminiferal fauna of the Minaminaganuma Formation is dominated by the large elphidiids Elphidium mabutii and Cribroelphidium ombetsuense. Foraminiferal assemblages indicate cold and shallow marine conditions that are not deeper than the middle sublittoral zone.

  2. A comparison of the foraminiferal fauna with geochemical data demonstrates that primary productivity in the shallow seas controlled the distribution of benthic foraminifera. Elphidium mabutii and C. ombetsuense exhibit particularly high tolerance to environmental stress such as fluctuations in the nutrition supply.

  3. The foraminiferal fauna of the Minaminaganuma Formation from southern Hokkaido is placed stratigraphically between the Eocene-Oligocene Poronai-Momijiyama fauna (agglutinated foraminifera-dominant) and the Miocene Takinoue fauna (Ammonia-dominant).

  4. An equilibrium between subsidence and sediment accumulation is inferred to have been existed at least since the Eocene until the Late Oligocene in southern Hokkaido. Such tectonics imply that the historical change of the tectonic setting related to the origin of the Japan Sea occurred during or after the deposition of the marine sequence of the Minaminaganuma Formation.

The foraminiferal faunas and tectonics of Hokkaido in the Late Oligocene remain poorly understood in many aspects mainly due to a paucity of stratigraphic information; therefore, the results of the present study provide some basis for future studies.

Acknowledgments

I thank Fumio Akiba (Diatom Minilab Akiba Ltd.) for his encouragement and suggestions for the improvement of an earlier version of the manuscript. Peter R. Thompson improved the text and provided many suggestions. This paper was revised after fruitful advice from anonymous reviewers and editors. Yoshiteru Kajiwara (Japan Petroleum Exploration Co. Ltd.) operated Rock-Eval. Japan Petroleum Exploration Co. Ltd. and Japan National Oil Corporation (presently Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation) granted permission to publish this paper. I would like to express special thanks to Chikara Hiramatsu, Michiko Miwa, Keiko Inaba, Yoko Kuwashima, and other staff of the Japan Petroleum Exploration Co. Ltd. for their technical assistance and encouragement.

References

1.

F. Akiba 1985. Middle Miocene to Quaternary diatom biostratigraphy in the Nankai Trough and Japan Trench, and modified Lower Miocene through Quaternary diatom zones for middle-to-high latitudes of the North Pacific. In, Scientific Party. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project vol. 87:p. 393–480.U. S. Government Printing Office. Washington. Google Scholar

2.

K. Akimoto and H. Hasegawa . 1989. Bathymetric distribution of the Recent benthic foraminifers around Japan–As a contribution to the new paleobathymetric scale–. The Memoirs of the Geological Society of Japan no. 32p. 229–240. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

3.

A. V. Altenbach, U. Pflaumann, R. Schiebel, A. Thies, S. Timm, and M. Trauth . 1999. Scaling percentages and distribution patterns of benthic foraminifers with flux rates of organic carbon. Journal of Foraminiferal Research vol. 29:p. 173–185. Google Scholar

4.

K. Asano 1949. Foraminifera from the Asagai Formation (Tertiary) of Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Journal of Paleontology vol. 23:p. 473–478. Google Scholar

5.

K. Asano 1952a. Foraminifera from the Miocene Takinoue Formation near Momijiyama, Hokkaido. Short Papers, IGPS no. 4p. 47–51. Google Scholar

6.

K. Asano 1952b. Illustrated catalogue of Japanese Tertiary smaller foraminifera supplement No. 1p. Hosokawa Printing Co. Tokyo. Google Scholar

7.

K. Asano 1953. Miocene foraminifera from the Shintotsugawa Area, Kabato-gun, Hokkaido. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan New Series, no. 10, p. 45–54. Google Scholar

8.

K. Asano 1962. Japanese Paleogene from view-point of foraminifera with description of several new species. Contributions from the Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Tohoku University no. 57p. 1–32. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

9.

W. A. Berggren, D. V. Kent, C. C. Swisher III, and M-P. Aubry . 1995. A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy. In W. A. Berggren, D. V. Kent, M-P. Aubry, and J. Hardenbol , editors. eds. Geochronology, Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation SEPM Special Publication. no. 54p. 129–212. Google Scholar

10.

W. H. Blow 1969. Late Middle Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. In P. Brönnimann and H. H. Renz , editors. eds. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils Vol. 1:p. 199–421.E. J. Brill. Leiden. Google Scholar

11.

H. M. Bolli and J. B. Saunders . 1985. Oligocene to Holocene low latitude planktic foraminifera. In H. M. Bolli, J. B. Saunders, and K. Perch-Nielsen , editors. eds. Plankton Stratigraphy p. 155–262.Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

12.

M. A. Buzas 1966. The discrimination of morphological groups of Elphidium (foraminifera) in Long Island Sound through canonical analysis and invariant characters. Journal of Paleontology vol. 40:p. 585–594. Google Scholar

13.

J. A. Cushman 1926. Foraminifera from the typical Monterey of California. Contributions from the Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research vol. 2:p. 3–6. Google Scholar

14.

J. A. Cushman 1927. Recent foraminifera from off the West Coast of America. Bulletin of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Technical Series vol. 1:p. 119–188. Google Scholar

15.

J. A. Cushman, R. E. Stewart, and K. C. Stewart . 1948. Astoria Miocene foraminifera from Agate Beach, Lincoln County, Oregon. State of Oregon, Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Bulletin no. 36, pt. 2p. 1–110. Google Scholar

16.

J. Espitalié, M. Madec, B. Tissot, J. H. Mennig, and P. Leplat . 1977. Source rock characterization method for petroleum exploration. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston vol. 2935:p. 439–444. Google Scholar

17.

K. Fujii and N. Moritani . 1998. Drilling and completion technologies applied for the development of the Yufutsu field. Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology vol. 63:p. 369–375. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

18.

A. Y. Gladenkov and J. A. Barron . 1995. Oligocene and early Middle Miocene diatom biostratigraphy of Hole 884B. In D. K. Rea, I. A. Basov, D. W. Scholl, and J. F. Allan , editors. eds. Proceedings of Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results vol. 145:p. 21–41. College Station TX (Ocean Drilling Program). Google Scholar

19.

S. Hanagata 2002. Eocene shallow marine foraminifera from subsurface sections in the Yufutsu-Umaoi district, Hokkaido, Japan. Paleontological Research vol. 6:p. 147–178. Google Scholar

20.

S. Hanagata 2003. Reconsideration of the geohistory of the Eocene Poronai and the Oligocene Momijiyama formations from foraminiferal data. Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology vol. 68:p. 259–270. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

21.

S. Hanagata and C. Hiramatsu . 2005. Miocene-Pliocene Foraminifera from the subsurface sections in the Yufutsu Oil and Gas Field, Hokkaido. Paleontological Research vol. 9:p. 273–298. Google Scholar

22.

B. U. Haq, J. Hardenbol, and P. R. Vail . 1987. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science vol. 235:p. 1156–1167. Google Scholar

23.

S. Hasegawa, K. Akimoto, H. Kitazato, and Y. Matoba . 1989. Late Cenozoic paleobathymetric indices based on benthic foraminifers in Japan. The Memoirs of the Geological Society of Japan no. 32p. 241–253. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

24.

H. Hoshi and M. Takahashi . 1999. Miocene counterclockwise rotation of Northeast Japan; a review and new model. Bulletins of the Geological Survey of Japan vol. 50:p. 3–16. Google Scholar

25.

A. Iijima and R. Tada . 1990. Evolution of Tertiary sedimentary basins of Japan in reference to opening of the Japan Sea. Journal of the Faculty of Science, the University of Tokyo, Section II, Geology, Mineralogy, Geography, Geophysics vol. 22:p. 121–171. Google Scholar

26.

Y. Ishiwada 1962. Benthonic foraminifera off the Pacific coast of Japan referred to biostratigraphy of the Kazusa Group. Report of the Geological Survey of Japan no. 205p. 1–45. Google Scholar

27.

K. Kaiho 1983. Geologic ages of the Paleogene of Hokkaido, Japan based upon planktonic foraminifera –The relationship between the hiatuses and sea-level movements–. Fossil (Palaeontological Society of Japan) no. 34p. 41–49. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

28.

K. Kaiho 1984a. Paleogene foraminifera from Hokkaido, Japan. Part 1. Lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy including description of new species. Science Report of Tohoku University, 2nd Series (Geology) vol. 54:p. 95–139. Google Scholar

29.

K. Kaiho 1984b. Paleogene foraminifera from Hokkaido, Japan. Part 2. Correlation of the Paleogene system in Hokkaido and systematic paleontology. Science Report of Tohoku University, 2nd Series (Geology) vol. 55:p. 1–74. Google Scholar

30.

K. Kaiho 1992. Comparative taxonomy and faunal provinces of benthic foraminifera from late Eocene intermediate-water. Micropaleontology vol. 38:p. 363–396. Google Scholar

31.

K. Kaiho and S. Hasegawa . 1984. Benthic foraminifera from middle Oligocene Kamicharo Formation. In T. Saito, H. Okada, and K. Kaiho , editors. eds. Biostratigraphy and International Correlation of the Paleogene System in Japan p. 49–50. Faculty of Science. Yamagata University. Yamagata. (in Japanese, original title translated). Google Scholar

32.

M. A. Kaminski and A. Wetzel . 2004. A tubular protozoan predator: A burrow selectively filled with tubular agglutinated protozoans (Xenophyophorea, Foraminifera) in the abyssal South China Sea. In M. Bubik and M. A. Kaminski , editors. eds. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera Grzybowski Foundation Special Publication, 8, p. 287–293. Google Scholar

33.

M. Kato 1990. Introduction. In, Editorial Committee of Hokkaido, Part 1 of Regional Geology of Japan eds. Regional Geology of Japan Part 1 Hokkaido Chapter 1, p. 1–4. and back cover. Kyoritsu Shuppan Co. Ltd. Tokyo. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

34.

G. Keller 1980. Benthic foraminifers and paleobathymetry of the Japan Trench area, Leg 57, Deep Sea Drilling Project. In, Scientific Party. Initial Reports of Deep Sea Drilling Project vol. 56 and 57:part 2U. S. Government Printing Office. Washington. p. 835–865. Google Scholar

35.

G. Kimura and K. Tamaki . 1986. Collision, rotation, and back-arc spreading in the region of the Okhotsk and Japan Seas. Tectonics vol. 5:389–401. Google Scholar

36.

M. Kuniyasu and Y. Yamada . 2004. Structural styles of deep zones in southern central Hokkaido, northern Japan. Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology vol. 69:p. 131–144. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

37.

H. Kurita and M. Miwa . 1998. Dinoflagellate cyst biostratigraphy and age of the Oligocene Momijiyama Formation, Yubari Coal-Field, central Hokkaido, Japan. The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan vol. 104:p. 56–59. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

38.

H. Kurita and S. Yokoi . 2000. Cenozoic tectonic settings and a current exploration concept in southern central Hokkaido, northern Japan. Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology vol. 65:p. 58–70. (in Japanese with English abstract). Google Scholar

39.

M. B. Lagoe 1979. Modern benthic foraminifera from Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Journal of Paleontology vol. 53:p. 258–262. Google Scholar

40.

C. Linné 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus 1 (Regnum Animale) p. Laurentii Salvii. Holmiae (Stockholm). Google Scholar

41.

J. H. Lipps 1979. Ecology and paleoecology of planktonic Foraminifera. In J. H. Lipps, M. A. Buzas, R. G. Douglas, and C. A. Ross , editors. eds. Foraminiferal Ecology and Paleoecology SEPM Short Course. no. 6p. 62–104.Houston, Texas. Google Scholar

42.

J. H. Lipps and J. E. Warme . 1966. Planktonic foraminiferal biofacies in the Okhotsk Sea. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research vol. 17:p. 125–134. Google Scholar

43.

A. R. Loeblich Jr. and H. Tappan . 1953. Studies of Arctic Foraminifera. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections vol. 121:p. 1–150. Google Scholar

44.

A. R. Loeblich Jr. and H. Tappan . 1987. Foraminiferal Genera and their Classification 2 vols.p. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. New York. Google Scholar

45.

A. R. Loeblich Jr. and H. Tappan . 1992. Present status of foraminiferal classification. In Y. Takayanagi and T. Saito , editors. eds. Studies of Benthic Foraminifera, Benthos ‘90, Sendai, 1990 p. 93–102.Tokai University Press. Shizuoka. Google Scholar

46.

P. Loubere and M. Fariduddin . 1999. Benthic foraminifera and the flux of organic carbon to the sea bed. In B. K. Sen Gupta , editor. ed. Modern Foraminifera p. 181–199.Kluwer Academic Publishers. Amsterdam. Google Scholar

47.

S. Maiya, F. Akiba, and T. Ichinoseki . 1981. Kushiro Area (3) –Kamicharo–. In R. Tsuchi and M. Ibaraki , editors. eds. Fundamental data on Japanese Neogene, bio-and chronostratigraphy – Supplement – p. 45–46. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

48.

S. Maiya, T. Kodato, Y. Ikuji, and T. Shimazaki . 1982. Problem of the Neogene biostratigraphy in the Tenpoku and Chikubetsu-Haboro areas. In T. Tanai , editor. ed. Report on the Neogene biostratigraphy of Hokkaido p. 23–32. Report of the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Kakenhi), Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. (in Japanese, original title translated). Google Scholar

49.

G. W. Moore and K. Fujioka . 1980. Age and origin of dacite boulder conglomerate anomalously near the Japan Trench. In, Scientific Party. Initial Reports of Deep Sea Drilling Project vol. 56 and 57:part 2p. 1083–1088.U. S. Government Printing Office. Washington. Google Scholar

50.

R. Morita, L. V. Titova, and F. Akiba . 1996. Oligocene-Early Miocene molluscs and diatoms from the Kitami-Tsubetsu area, eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Science Reports of Tohoku University, Second Series (Geology) vol. 63:p. 53–213. Google Scholar

51.

Ad' Orbigny 1846. Foraminifères fossiles du Bassin Tertiaire de Vienne (Autriche). p. 1–303.Gide et Comp. Paris. Google Scholar

52.

F. B. Phleger and A. Soutar . 1973. Production of benthic foraminifera in three east Pacific oxygen minima. Micropaleontology vol. 19:p. 110–115. Google Scholar

53.

Ch Pomerol and I. Premoli-Silva . 1986. Part I–The Eocene-Oligocene transition: events and boundary. In Ch Pomerol and I. Premoli-Silva , editors. eds. Development in Paleontology and Stratigraphy, 9: Terminal Eocene Events p. 1–24.Elsevier Science Publishing Company. New York. Google Scholar

54.

KhM. Saidova 1961. Ekologiya foraminifer i paleogeografiya dal'nevostochnykh morey SSSR i severo-zapadnoy chasti Tikhogo Okeana Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Institut Okeanologii im. P. P. Shirshova. Moskva (Moscow). p. 1–232. (in Russian). Google Scholar

55.

B. K. Sen Gupta 1999. Foraminifera in marginal marine environments. In B. K. Sen Gupta , editor. ed. Modern Foraminifera p. 141–159.Kluwer Academic Publishers. Amsterdam. Google Scholar

56.

E. H. Simpson 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature vol. 163:p. 688. Google Scholar

57.

F. F. Steininger 1994. A proposal for the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Neogene (the Palaeogene/Neogene boundary). International Commission on Stratigraphy, Subcommission on Neogene Stratigraphy, Working Group on the Palaeogene/Neogene Boundary Special Publication, Institute for Paleontology, University of Vienna. p. 1–41. Google Scholar

58.

M. Takahashi 1994. Miocene lateral bending of central Japan–Intraarc deformation at arc-arc collision zone–. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan vol. 45:p. 477–495. Google Scholar

59.

Y. Takayanagi, S. Hasegawa, M. Oda, and T. Maruyama . 1982. Neogene microfossils from eastern Hokkaido. In T. Tanai , editor. ed. Recent Progress of Neogene Biostratigraphy of Hokkaido p. 33–48. Hokkaido University. (in Japanese, original title translated). Google Scholar

60.

N. Takeda 1980. Rapid method for source-rock evaluation; Availability and problem of ROCK-EVAL. Report of the Technology Research Center, J. N. O. C no. 11p. 1–17. Google Scholar

61.

B. P. Tissot, B. Dorand, J. Espitalié, and A. Combaz . 1974. Influence of nature and diagenesis of organic matter in formation of petroleum. Bulletins of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists vol. 58:p. 499–506. Google Scholar

62.

M. Toumarkine and H. Luterbacher . 1985. Paleocene and Eocene planktonic foraminifera. In H. M. Bolli, J. B. Saunders, and K. Perch-Nielsen , editors. eds. Plankton Stratigraphy p. 87–154.Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

63.

R. V. Tyson and T. H. Pearson . 1991. Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia: an overview. In R. V. Tyson and T. H. Pearson , editors. eds. Modern and Ancient Continental Shelf Anoxia p. 1–24.Geological Society Special Publication. no. 58 Google Scholar

64.

H. Watanabe and M. Akiyama . 1998. Characterization of organic matter in the Miocene turbidites and hemipelagic mudstones in the Niigata oil field, central Japan. Organic Geochemistry vol. 29:605–611. Google Scholar

65.

M. Yanagisawa, Y. Takigami, M. Ozima, and I. Kaneoka . 1980. 40Ar/39Ar ages of boulder drilled at Site 439, Leg 57, Deep Sea Drilling Project. In, Scientific Party. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project vol. 56 and 57:part 2p. 1281–1284.U. S. Government Printing Office. Washington. Google Scholar

66.

Y. Yanagisawa and F. Akiba . 1998. Refined Neogene diatom biostratigraphy for the northwest Pacific around Japan, with introduction of code numbers for selected diatom biohorizons. The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan vol. 104:p. 395–414. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix:

Taxonomic notes. Foraminifera identified in this study are listed below in taxonomic order of Loeblich and Tappan (1987, 1992).

Haplophragmoides sp. 1 (Figure 10.1)

Figure 10.

Foraminifera from the Minaminaganuma Formation. All figured specimens from the well MITI Umaoi. All scale bars = 0.1 mm. 1. Haplophragmoides sp. 1. Sample depth 200 m. 2. Haplophragmoides sp., Sample depth 2320 m. 3. ?Glomospira sp. Sample depth 2760 m. 4. Pyrgo sp. Sample depth 2420 m. 5, 6. Quinqueloculina cf. Q. seminula (Linné). Sample depth of 5: 1960 m, of 6: 2480 m. 7. Indeterminable calcareous foraminifer (? planktonic foraminifer). Sample depth 2020 m. 8, 9. Bolivina sp. 1. Sample depth of 8: 1980 m, of 9: 2420 m. 10, 11. Globocassidulina sp. 1., both specimens from depth of 2140 m. 12, 13. Bulimina sp. 1., both specimens from depth of 1920 m. 14. Globobulimina sp. Sample depth 2160 m. 15. Protoglobobulimina pupoides (d'Orbigny). Sample depth 1940 m. 16. Nonionella miocenica Cushman. Sample depth 1940 m. 17. Pullenia aff. P. apertula Cushman. Sample depth 2360 m.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f10.gif

Diagnosis.Haplophragmoides species with a test of medium size, coarsely agglutinating surface and biumbilicate coiling.

Remarks.— Single specimen occurred from depth of 200 m of MITI Umaoi borehole. It occurred with indeterminable Cribroelphidium species and probably is a shallow marine species.

Quinqueloculina cf. Q. seminula (Linné) (Figures 10.5, 6)

Compared with Serpula seminulum Linné, 1758, p. 786.

Remarks.— This species occurred in two samples from MITI Umaoi borehole. This study tentatively treats this species with “cf.” because of the unobservable aperture filled with sediment and worn surface.

Bolivina sp. 1 (Figures 10.8, 9)

Diagnosis.— Small-sized Bolivina species with short and slender test without ornamentation.

Remarks.— This rather simple species of Bolivina occurred only in two samples of MITI Umaoi borehole.

Globocassidulina sp. 1 (Figures 10.10, 11)

Diagnosis.Globocassidulina species with a compressed test of small to medium size, aperture is near rounded periphery.

Remarks.— Preservation of specimens is always too poor to observe the structure of the aperture and other features, and consequently it is difficult to make an exact identification.

Bulimina sp. 1 ( Figures 10.12, 13)

Diagnosis.— Small Bulimina species with cylindrical shape, obscure sutures without ornamentation and slitlike aperture on the apertural face.

Remarks.— Almost all specimens are poorly preserved. Slower growth rate and indistinct sutures characterize this species. It is probably a distinct species to be described as new.

Protoglobobulimina pupoides (d'Orbigny) (Figure 10.15)

Bulimina pupoides d'Orbigny, 1846, p. 185, pl. 11, figs. 11–12.

Remarks.— This species is commonly found in the Eocene through Miocene of Hokkaido (Asano, 1952b; Kaiho, 1992).

Nonionella miocenica Cushman (Figure 10.16)

Nonionella miocenica Cushman, 1926, p. 64, fig. 4a–c.

Remarks.— Three specimens occurred from depths of 1940 m, 1980 m and 2960 m (cf.) of MITI Umaoi borehole. It has been commonly found in the Miocene of Hokkaido (Asano, 1953), but its range is found here to be older.

Pullenia aff. P. apertula Cushman (Figures 10.17; 11.1, 2)

Figure 11.

Foraminifera from the Minaminaganuma Formation. All figured specimens from the well MITI Umaoi. All scale bars = 0.1 mm. 1–2. Pullenia aff. apertula Cushman. Sample depth of 1 = 1960 m; of 2 = 1900 m. 3–5. Buccella oregonensis (Cushman, Stewart and Stewart). Sample depth of 3 and 4 = 3000 m; of 5 = 1940 m. 7–10. Cribroelphidium ombetsuense (Asano). Sample depth of 6 and 10 = 1940 m; of 7 = 2000 m; of 8 and 9 = 1900 m. Specimens of 7 and 8 are descriminated as var. 1.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f11.gif

Compared with Pullenia apertula Cushman, 1927, p. 171, pl. 6, fig. 10.

Remarks.— This species is distinguished from typical P. apertula in having seven chambers in the final whorl instead of six. Most specimens are distorted and observation of the aperture is difficult for exact identification.

Buccella oregonensis (Cushman, Stewart and Stewart) (Figures 11.3–5)

Eponides mansfieldi var. oregonensis Cushman, Stewart and Stewart, 1948, p. 48, pl. 6, figs. a–c.

Cribroelphidium ombetsuense (Asano) (Figures 11.7–10; 12.1–7)

Figure 12.

Foraminifera from the Minaminaganuma Formation. All figured specimens from the well MITI Umaoi. All scale bars = 0.1 mm. 1–7. Cribroelphidium ombetsuense (Asano). Sample depth of 1 = 1900 m; of 2 = 1940 m; of 3–7 = 2000 m. Specimens of 1 and 2 are descriminated as var. 1. 8–11. Elphidium mabutii Asano. Sample depth of all specimens, 2000 m. Note that the number of chambers in the final whorl increases with growth: juvenile specimen (9) has 11, 8 has 13, 10 has 15, and 11, the largest, has 18 chambers in the final whorl, respectively.

i1342-8144-12-2-99-f12.gif

Elphidium ombetsuense Asano, 1962, p. 32, pl. 1, fig. 7a, b.

Remarks.— This species occur abundantly from whole sections. It was originally described from the Eocene Omagari Formation with Elphidium mabutii. This species resembles Cribroelphidium yumotoense Asano (1949) described from the Paleogene Asagai Formation in northern Honshu, but is distinguishable in having a broader test and more chambers than the latter species. Specimens with small test and less inflated chambers are distinguished as C. ombetsuense var. 1 in this study (Figures 11.8–10, 12.1, 2).

Elphidium mabutii Asano (Figures 12.8–11)

Elphidium mabutii Asano, 1962, p. 31–32, pl. 1, figs. 4a, b; 6a, b.; Kaiho, 1984b, p. 70, pl. 6, fig. 11a, b.

Remarks.— This species occurred abundantly from whole sections of the Minaminaganuma Formation. In this study, 3,744 specimens were counted, and the range of the variation of this species in terms of its test size and number of chambers was clarified. In the original description of Asano (1962) from the Eocene Omagari Formation in eastern Hokkaido, the number of chambers in the last whorl is 13 to 15, the suture is distinct, and the periphery is subacute. But in this study, the number of chambers in the last whorl in the largest specimens is up to 18, while immature specimens have as few as 11 chambers. Most adult forms have smooth lamellae on the test surface, which cover the sutures.

Elphidium iojimaense Asano and Murata resembles the adult form of E. mabutii, but the former has a relatively acute periphery.

Satoshi Hanagata "Oligocene shallow marine foraminifera from the subsurface of southern Hokkaido," Paleontological Research 12(2), 99-118, (1 June 2008). https://doi.org/10.2517/1342-8144(2008)12[99:OSMFFT]2.0.CO;2
Received: 10 January 2006; Accepted: 22 November 2007; Published: 1 June 2008
KEYWORDS
basin evolution
Foraminifera
Hokkaido
Oligocene
paleoenvironment
Back to Top